abstract

​

Oscar Niemeyer has always caused controversy in the architectural establishment, as well as in the political realm.  Most critical commentaries centre around his interpretation of orthodox modernism during his early years as a disciple of Le Corbusier.  He is both admired and criticised for the formal liberties he takes.

There seems to be an inherent lack of knowledge, with the exception of Brasilia, as regards to the full repertoire of Niemeyer’s architecture.  A deeper understanding of his work is required.  This study examines many of the varied contexts - physical, historical, cultural, socio-economic, political, urban, artistic, and theoretical - in which Niemeyer has worked. 

I believe his architecture to have a much deeper meaning, and this body of work explores some of the misconceived ideas on Niemeyer.